Brands in the News

United’s Branding Disaster

10 Apr , 2017  

Yesterday United Airlines forcibly removed a passenger from an overbooked flight. Other passengers captured the incident on video. You can watch it here.

A Huge Problem

It is hard to overstate how bad this is for United. Let’s review what happened:

– United boards too many people and won’t offer enough money to entice someone to take a later flight.

– The airline randomly picks passengers to bump. When someone protests, United arranges for him to be dragged from the place. He is bloodied and bruised.

– United did this in order to accommodate crew members; it wasn’t to provide space for other passengers.

Airlines disappoint people every day: flights are late, customers get bumped and luggage vanishes, but this is different. It is difficult to think of another corporation physically assaulting a customer in such a manner. Have we seen something like this from McDonalds? No. Walmart? No. Starbucks? No. Delta? No.

United drags a passenger from a plane to make room for a United employee? Really? This has sparked some remarkable comments on social media.

Difficult Questions

The  incident raises all sorts of tough questions for United.

What sort of company culture led to this? Why would anyone think this was the best way to manage the situation?

Were the front-line employees really out of options? What sort of pressure are they under?

Next Steps

United CEO Oscar Munoz responded this morning. The prompt statement was good but the wording was tone deaf. In particular, Munoz wrote, “I apologize for having to re-accommodate these customers.” That is a terrible statement. United didn’t “re-accommodate” the passenger in the video; United arranged for him to be physically dragged from the plane.

Munoz needs to quickly apologize for the incident and state that United will try very hard to not leave passengers bloodied and battered. Well, perhaps it should skip that last part. The airline should announce that it is conducting a thorough outside review of its culture and policies in an effort to understand how something like this happened, and to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

This a rough day for the United brand.



4 Responses

  1. I’m curious how much of this resulted as a byproduct of broader company culture / official protocol (why did they board the plane if they knew they needed excess capacity for their crew?) vs. front line staff making an error by boarding the plane and making an ill-fated call to security. This is not to rationalize what happened but definitely seems like a need for either a massive overhaul of protocol to handle situations and/or investment in company wide training on these situations to begin to regain some of their lost brand credibility as a result of this horrid incident.

  2. emitahill says:

    Really bad. I waited 10 hours in an airport Saturday. Problem was that the airline had not grounded planes and canceled flights in really bad weather so they all sat on ground, still ostensibly working,m and the next day (Saturday) when weather was good and planes were there, the crews couldn’t work. Not a good scene. No way to run a business. It was Delta. I wonder what United did in the same conditions.

  3. Alain Weber says:

    Indeed Tim, this is a rough day for United.

    This brutal action was certainly unexpected. But, upon reflecting on general airlines’ attitude toward passengers, I was outraged but not that surprised. From tighter seat and knee space to low quality of food (“pasta or chicken?”), the goal is seemingly not to find ways to offer a pleasant trip but to cram as many passengers as possible on a plane or in this case to expel a paying passenger without offering proper compensation.
    On a recent flight from London to Chicago, in the large economy section which was full, instead of the 6 or 8 toilets, there were only 4 bathrooms. So for most of the flight, folks waited their turn. And this was on a brand new plane.

    Sure United must apologize for this appaling incident but all airlines should also rethink their attitude toward passengers

  4. Bob Schieffer says:

    Great comments Tim!
    I think United had a simple solution here.
    Simple keeping raising the price offer until someone says OK!
    Surely someone would have given up their seat for $3,000!
    Bob

Leave a Reply

Archives

Conversation Across the Site

  • Stephen Calkins { You were kind not to protest. For an argument that customer service is a key part of iPhone success, see story in today's New York... } – The High Cost of Poor Service
  • emitahill { Wonderful, Tim. I am wildly envious. Love all three of those cities and haven't been in far too long. } – Branding Observations from a Trip to Europe
  • Stephen Calkins { If Whitmire followed other advice you've given--live frugally and save regularly--at least he'll not have serious financial worries. He's 57 and presumably still receiving movie... } – Learning from Kermit’s Downfall
  • Dana { Charging fees is only one part of the racket HA is doing. They are also collecting all monies, collecting interest on the homeowners rents and... } – Why Homeaway’s New Fee Makes Sense
  • Jos. Smedley { Two Dogs, well today we received news from Home Away that starting SOON { "coming to a theatre near you" } there will be a... } – Why Homeaway’s New Fee Makes Sense
  • Jos. Smedley { Melissa, we could not agree with you more and pray that their chickens come home to roost ! Perhaps you would be kind enough to... } – Why Homeaway’s New Fee Makes Sense
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.