Kraft’s Uncertain Future

3 Oct , 2012  

This week I’m busy teaching in the Kellogg on Branding executive education program. Earlier today one of the participants asked me for my thoughts on the new Kraft Foods. This was a timely question; Kraft is in the news because the company just completed its split. The fast growing snacks business is now a distinct company called Mondelez. Kraft Foods is the North American grocery business, made up of brands like Miracle Whip, Grey Poupon and Cool Whip.

In theory the new Kraft should do well because the company can now focus on the grocery business. The combined company logically devoted resources and time to the high growth snacks business, neglecting the grocery side. With additional focus, the grocery business should do well, at least in theory.

The reality isn’t quite so simple. The new Kraft has two significant issues. First, Kraft hasn’t invested in its grocery brands for many years. Bloomberg recently reported that, according to a New York consulting firm, Kraft spent only 3% of sales on advertising over the past couple years. This is dramatically lower than General Mills (5.7%) and Kellogg (8.6%). With little investment the brands have eroded and now need innovation and great marketing. This spending will probably have a negative short-term ROI; building brands doesn’t deliver quick profits.

Second, Kraft plays in mature categories. There just isn’t a lot of growth in gelatin and macaroni and mayonnaise. One might wish for lots of growth, and proclaim that with innovation the category growth will appear. But that just isn’t likely to happen.

Kraft might have a bright future. The company could rebuild its brands, win over customers and deliver solid financial returns.

The key, however, is setting appropriate financial expectations. Kraft won’t be growing much, perhaps not at all. In the short run, profits should actually decline some as the company invests in marketing and innovation. But the dividend should be solid and results generally consistent and predictable.

The risk is that the new executive team tries to generate significant growth. The easy way to get growth in profits is to cut overhead, trim marketing, reduce product costs and spend on quick volume driving tactics like discounting. This formula will lead to long-term brand erosion and a difficult future.

Giving the new executive lots of stock options would be a very bad move; the stock market rewards quick profit growth. It is hard to resist the temptation to focus on short-term profits when there are options at stake. Hopefully the board sets the right incentives and Kraft’s new executive team builds the business, setting the stage for a bright future.

2 Responses

  1. Dr.P.G.K.Murthy says:

    An excellent paper. Brand building is a long term exercise

  2. Bob Killian says:

    Makes good sense. You do have to wonder if they’ll be able to attract or retain as much talent in this half of the divorced company.

    Bob Killian Killian Branding 322 South Green Chicago IL 60607 312.836.0050 Cell: 312.399.2894 Worth reading: Blog:

Leave a Reply


Conversation Across the Site

  • emitahill { Hilarious and accurate lesson, Tim. I already watched and loved Colbert's take on it. But DT heeds no lessons and observes no facts that contradict... } – Learning from Trump’s Weather Map Fiasco
  • jnemery { Well, you are right about the relationships, but you are wrong about the hogs not being better. A 4-H hog is hand-raised, the feed carefully... } – Learning from a 4-H Market Pig Auction
  • Anne { As soon as I found out Clorox bought Burt's Bees I knew they were going to start polluting the products! Come's Clorox. Why would... } – Clorox Stumbles with Burt's Bees
  • emitahill { That's a devastating story and just as many smaller dairy farms are shutting down. Read Madeleine's story about Leelanau Cheese on FB. It will be... } – Fair Oaks Deals With a Brand Crisis
  • davetuchler { Horrifying story. Immediately brought to mind Boeing (737 MAX) and Vale (failed dams) -- loss of human lives, made more tragic by corporate indifference, incompetence,... } – UNC Health Care’s Brand Crisis
  • Sat Ganesha S. Khalsa { I postulate this happens at ALL organizations, an organization does not arrive at a tragedy of this proportion without signals, many signals. Yes, there is... } – UNC Health Care’s Brand Crisis
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.