Defense

The Bing Puzzle

3 Jul , 2012  

Microsoft is in the news this week with more bad news about its online division and its struggling search engine, Bing. Recent results have been just terrible; in the 9 months ending March 31 the division lost $1.45 billion on revenue of $2.1 billion. Microsoft this week announced a $6.2 billion write-off related to the online division and a prior acquisition. That is a lot of money, even for Microsoft.

This isn’t a big surprise. Bing is a perfectly respectable search engine but it is directly attacking Google. The problem is that Google has a very good search engine and brand; it works just fine and people know and like the Google brand. Why would anyone switch to Bing? It isn’t clear. So it isn’t surprising that they haven’t and Microsoft is losing tons of cash.

The puzzle is why Microsoft carries on at all. Microsoft’s CEO Steve Ballmer is apparently quite excited about it. Last summer he proclaimed “Bing is a service that is probably amongst the things I’m most excited about at Microsoft, most excited.”

So why is Steve excited about Bing?

It might be that he thinks Bing will start working and people will switch. People tend to think their children are far above average. Perhaps Steve is similarly delusional.

Or it might be that Microsoft has other things in the works, either a new technology that will significantly improve the offerings or a positioning that will finally establish a clear place for Bing to live.

For now I think we can conclude that Bing is yet another example of a company attacking an entrenched competitor by launching a perfectly respectable product and supporting it heavily. And this rarely goes well.


One Response

  1. I go to Bing every morning to see the beautiful picture of the day, then go to Google to search.

Leave a Reply

Archives

Conversation Across the Site

  • Todd { Thank you for this insight, Professor. Students rarely have any insight into the mind of a professor or teacher at any level. Come to think... }
  • Mark Sheldon { Very interesting. Thank you and I think your analysis is generally correct. The one thing I would add is that in a small zoom class... }
  • Marty { Ford , built for change ? This is the company Hank almost bankrupted by refusing to replace the model T }
  • toddholscher { If Trump had the charisma of Reagan, instead of Nixon, it would have been different. Trump was easy to vote against for enough people... this... }
  • Emita Hill { Sobering but all accurate. Happy Thanksgiving, Tim. }
  • Mark Goldman { Disagree wholeheartedly. National unity and bringing back civility to our country is most certainly a benefit -- and a strong one. Trump's pitch on law... }
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.