Brands in the News

Groupon’s Problem

18 Oct , 2011  

Groupon is gearing up for an IPO. My advice to the team planning the offering is quite simple: move quickly.

Andrew Ross Sorkin has as an interesting article on Groupon in today’s New York Times. He notes that Groupon has a number of rather significant issues, including a fairly low cash balance and a working capital deficit.

I think Groupon has perhaps a more fundamental problem: its current model isn’t likely to produce sustainable growth.

Groupon connects customers and companies. Customers come to Groupon looking for deals and companies come to Groupon offering deals. Groupon connects the two groups and pockets a rather large portion of the revenue.

On the surface this seems like a win-win-win situation.

But it isn’t.

The problem is that customers and companies actually want different things. Customers want great deals on brands they love: Whole Foods, Starbucks and the funky new restaurant down the street. Companies want to offer deals on new products and fading brands. Someone with a popular brand doesn’t need to offer a Groupon.

To date, Groupon has grown in part because companies are experimenting, seeing how the Groupon system actually works. I suspect this is why Whole Foods offered a deal on Living Social and why Gap offered a deal on Groupon.

As companies learn how Groupon works they will become more selective.

When Groupon primarily offers deals on new brands people haven’t heard of and brands that are clearly fading, customers will move on to other things.

This trend might already be developing; Groupon only grew revenue by 13 percent in August.

To have any chance of getting a high valuation Groupon should get its IPO done ASAP.


One Response

  1. I couldn’t agree more with you on the article. I have already a lot of negative experiences with companies who had deals on groupon: not only that those customers rarely returned (to e.g. restaurants as guests), but they have often brought negative publicity to those restaurants and often repelled the existing clients. As you have also said, well known brand does not need giving away for free on Groupon.

    On another side, from my personal observations, in last year we could witness worse offer on Groupon. Nowadays, only no-name brands are offering deals under suspicious conditions (‘buy 13, get 14th for free’ kind of deals), which is also rarely bringing value to end customer.

Leave a Reply

Archives

Conversation Across the Site

  • David Rose { This sounds very very difficult. You put alot of energy into it and obviosly care. I would suggest you focus on the room and let... }
  • M E Lesniak { I think you picked the wrong hill to stand on. You work at one of the most expensive degree factories in the country and I’m... }
  • Stephen Calkins { Forgiveness based on income? What if it is a wealthy family that figured borrowing cheaply was a good deal, but there is massive wealth? What... }
  • Todd Holscher { Transparency in pricing is a very good idea. Students will still susceptible to the influence of marketing and advertising by colleges, but it’s the right... }
  • Emita Hill { Vast sums of money. Alternatively provide more support to state schools so they can lower tuition and maybe to privates strictly for scholarships. }
  • David Rose { Tim, I dont think your views are balanced. You obviously are being paid by these loans. The money has been given to your university and... }
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.