Brands in the News

Groupon’s Problem

18 Oct , 2011  

Groupon is gearing up for an IPO. My advice to the team planning the offering is quite simple: move quickly.

Andrew Ross Sorkin has as an interesting article on Groupon in today’s New York Times. He notes that Groupon has a number of rather significant issues, including a fairly low cash balance and a working capital deficit.

I think Groupon has perhaps a more fundamental problem: its current model isn’t likely to produce sustainable growth.

Groupon connects customers and companies. Customers come to Groupon looking for deals and companies come to Groupon offering deals. Groupon connects the two groups and pockets a rather large portion of the revenue.

On the surface this seems like a win-win-win situation.

But it isn’t.

The problem is that customers and companies actually want different things. Customers want great deals on brands they love: Whole Foods, Starbucks and the funky new restaurant down the street. Companies want to offer deals on new products and fading brands. Someone with a popular brand doesn’t need to offer a Groupon.

To date, Groupon has grown in part because companies are experimenting, seeing how the Groupon system actually works. I suspect this is why Whole Foods offered a deal on Living Social and why Gap offered a deal on Groupon.

As companies learn how Groupon works they will become more selective.

When Groupon primarily offers deals on new brands people haven’t heard of and brands that are clearly fading, customers will move on to other things.

This trend might already be developing; Groupon only grew revenue by 13 percent in August.

To have any chance of getting a high valuation Groupon should get its IPO done ASAP.


One Response

  1. I couldn’t agree more with you on the article. I have already a lot of negative experiences with companies who had deals on groupon: not only that those customers rarely returned (to e.g. restaurants as guests), but they have often brought negative publicity to those restaurants and often repelled the existing clients. As you have also said, well known brand does not need giving away for free on Groupon.

    On another side, from my personal observations, in last year we could witness worse offer on Groupon. Nowadays, only no-name brands are offering deals under suspicious conditions (‘buy 13, get 14th for free’ kind of deals), which is also rarely bringing value to end customer.

Leave a Reply

Archives

Conversation Across the Site

  • Todd { Thank you for this insight, Professor. Students rarely have any insight into the mind of a professor or teacher at any level. Come to think... }
  • Mark Sheldon { Very interesting. Thank you and I think your analysis is generally correct. The one thing I would add is that in a small zoom class... }
  • Marty { Ford , built for change ? This is the company Hank almost bankrupted by refusing to replace the model T }
  • toddholscher { If Trump had the charisma of Reagan, instead of Nixon, it would have been different. Trump was easy to vote against for enough people... this... }
  • Emita Hill { Sobering but all accurate. Happy Thanksgiving, Tim. }
  • Mark Goldman { Disagree wholeheartedly. National unity and bringing back civility to our country is most certainly a benefit -- and a strong one. Trump's pitch on law... }
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.