Defense

The Royal Wedding and Branding

1 May , 2011  

The marriage of Kate and William was a joyous event but also an incredible bit of brand building.

It all looked effortless and natural, but of course it wasn’t. I am quite confident the entire affair was carefully constructed with an eye on the brand.

The organizers deserve an enormous amount of credit; it is hard to imagine a more powerful brand building moment.

The event received extraordinary coverage. Perhaps two billion people watched it around the world. Eleven networks in the U.S. covered the event, and more than 22 million people watched, according to the Associated Press. This is a fairly remarkable number given the rather early hour it aired in the U.S.

More remarkably, virtually all of the coverage was positive. People applauded the dress, the kiss, the ceremony, the guest list. The right people were apparently invited and the right people were not. I didn’t see a single negative article or comment.

I was most impressed at how the event reinforced the brand. The ceremony embraced continuity and tradition. It would have been easy for Kate and William to make at least symbolic breaks with the safe, standard approach. But they didn’t. And this was brilliant; the event was a powerful brand building tool because it reflected the best things we know about the royal family.

Vast, positive media coverage is what builds strong brands in the world today. Kate and William showed us how to do it.


2 Responses

  1. this was definatley done to build the “royal brand” and to bring some love back to the family

  2. Uday says:

    Though Kate and William followed the safe, standard approach I guess Harry provided a refreshing departure through his prank (where he attached a learners plate to their Aston Martin). I wonder if this kind of joke is common in royal occasions or symbolic of a changing of the guard.

Leave a Reply

Archives

Conversation Across the Site

  • David Rose { This sounds very very difficult. You put alot of energy into it and obviosly care. I would suggest you focus on the room and let... }
  • M E Lesniak { I think you picked the wrong hill to stand on. You work at one of the most expensive degree factories in the country and I’m... }
  • Stephen Calkins { Forgiveness based on income? What if it is a wealthy family that figured borrowing cheaply was a good deal, but there is massive wealth? What... }
  • Todd Holscher { Transparency in pricing is a very good idea. Students will still susceptible to the influence of marketing and advertising by colleges, but it’s the right... }
  • Emita Hill { Vast sums of money. Alternatively provide more support to state schools so they can lower tuition and maybe to privates strictly for scholarships. }
  • David Rose { Tim, I dont think your views are balanced. You obviously are being paid by these loans. The money has been given to your university and... }
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.