Learning from Playboy

12 Jul , 2010  

Playboy is in the news today, but not because this month’s edition includes a particularly risqué photo spread.  The news today: Hugh Hefner has offered to buy the company’s outstanding shares and take it private.

The surprising thing in the deal is the price.  Hefner’s bid values Playboy at just $185 million.  This is not a lot of money.  Several years ago Bacardi bought the Grey Goose brand for about $2 billion.   Just last week P&G acquired the Ambi Pur brand for about $380 million.

Based on today’s bid the Playboy brand is worth less than 10% of the Grey Goose brand, and less than 50% of Ambi Pur.

Hefner isn’t undervaluing Playboy, either.  Over the past five years Playboy has seen its revenue fall from $338 million to $240 million.  The company lost more than $50 million in 2009 alone.  Playboy is a troubled company and a troubled brand.

There is an important learning point in the collapse of Playboy: brands have to evolve.

Playboy at one point stood for something distinct; it was a unique voice in the industry.  According to Wikipedia, in 1972 the magazine had circulation of over 7 million copies.

Over time, however, the Playboy brand lost its way.  The core problem is that the brand got caught in the middle.  Today people looking for hard-core pornography have many more exciting options; they are not looking at Playboy.  Men looking for funny articles about the male life can read more dynamic publications such as Maxim and Esquire without being accused of looking at porn.

Playboy needed to change as the competitive set shifted, but it didn’t.

So what precisely is Playboy today?  It isn’t clear.  It isn’t porn, it isn’t new and it isn’t fresh.  I suppose it is old, an iconic and faded brand.

It is a brand with great awareness but little value.

One Response

  1. look beauty says:

    Hi, first I’m really happy I found this article. Also, let me say I like the way you write, makes it really nice to read. I’l take a look around the rest of the site, hope your other stuff is that interresting as well.

Leave a Reply


Conversation Across the Site

  • David Rose { This sounds very very difficult. You put alot of energy into it and obviosly care. I would suggest you focus on the room and let... }
  • M E Lesniak { I think you picked the wrong hill to stand on. You work at one of the most expensive degree factories in the country and I’m... }
  • Stephen Calkins { Forgiveness based on income? What if it is a wealthy family that figured borrowing cheaply was a good deal, but there is massive wealth? What... }
  • Todd Holscher { Transparency in pricing is a very good idea. Students will still susceptible to the influence of marketing and advertising by colleges, but it’s the right... }
  • Emita Hill { Vast sums of money. Alternatively provide more support to state schools so they can lower tuition and maybe to privates strictly for scholarships. }
  • David Rose { Tim, I dont think your views are balanced. You obviously are being paid by these loans. The money has been given to your university and... }
  • Read more Comments »

Collaborate with Tim

Tim helps companies around the world build great brands. To schedule a program or event click here. To learn more about Tim’s books, click here.